Categories
Cardiovascular
Diagnostics
Endocrinology
Health Insurance
Medical Devices
Mental Health
Nutrition
Oncology
Public Health
Sexual Health
Popular Articles

Lower Blood Glucose Levels Reduce Heart Disease Risk, Says New Research
New research claims that people with diabetes can cut their risk of a heart attack if they lower their blood glucose levels.
generic viagra online
Vaporized Viral Vector Shows Promise In Anti-Cancer Gene Therapy
A new lung cancer therapy employing a vaporized viral vector to deliver a cancer-inhibiting molecule directly to lung tissue shows early promise in mouse trials, according to researchers at the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology in Korea.
News of the day
Ohio Bill Would Require Biological Father's Consent For Abortion
A bill (HR 252) introduced this month in the Ohio House would require a pregnant woman seeking an abortion to obtain written consent from the fetus" biological father, the Cincinnati Enquirer reports. If the woman does not know the identity of the biological father, she would have to provide proof of paternity tests of potential fathers. The bill is sponsored by Rep. John Adams (R) and co-sponsored by four other Republicans.The bill would establish "abortion fraud" as a first-degree misdemeanor, punishable by up to six months in jail and a fine of up to $1,000. Repeat offenders could be charged with a fifth-degree felony, punishable by up to one year in jail and up to a $2,500 fine. The bill is not clear as to who could be fined or jailed. Becki Brenner, president of Planned Parenthood of Southwest Ohio, said that she believes doctors would be the ones ultimately fined or jailed.Brenner criticized the bill, saying that a woman would have to pay at least $1,400 for each DNA test if she is unsure who the father is. Brenner called the legislation "a burden on a woman," adding that the whole purpose behind the bill is to make it harder to obtain a legal abortion. She said, "Hopefully, [the bill] won"t even get debate in the committee" because it is "blatantly anti-woman."Paula Westwood, executive director of Right to Life of Greater Cincinnati, said that her group supports the bill. She added, "I would think men would want to have these rights."According to the Enquirer, the bill does not have the support of the House Democratic majority. The current version of the bill has not been assigned to a committee, and it is unlikely to pass the House, much like past bills seeking new restrictions on abortion (Craig/Preston, Cincinnati Enquirer, 7/24).
Endocrinology

Analysis: How Will $155 Billion Deal With White House Really Affect Hospitals?

When hospitals agreed to accept a $155 billion pay cut from the federal government to help Washington raise money for reform efforts earlier this month, it was "to the amazement of many," the Economist reports. "How can they justify giving away such a vast sum? There are several explanations, not all of them altruistic. Taken together, they show that the industry"s leaders are bracing themselves for a period of upheaval." Here are some motivating factors, according to the Economist: The industry will gain new customers from expanded access to health care, a chief goal of reform, the American Hospital Association says. Under the current system, hospitals treat lots of uninsured people who don"t pay their bills, netting around $34 billion in uncompensated care in 2007. Even though the government gives them money for some of this, they say that compensation fails to make them whole. "The huge sums the hospitals stand to gain from reducing such losses make even $155 billion over ten years look like a reasonable amount of money to sacrifice to secure such a bonanza," the Economist says. In addition, hospitals have sought to remain at the health reform negotiating table in hopes of thwarting plans for a new, government-run insurer they say would undercut their pricing and changes in the tax status of nonprofit hospitals that would cost many millions. Another "explicit concession wrung by the hospital bosses from the White House was a promise to crack down on clinics owned by doctors," which represent potential, unwanted competition for established hospitals. "As this back-room deal illustrates, the strongest motives behind the hospitals" ostensibly generous price cut were self-serving ones: to reduce competition, not boost it, and to head off any increase in government influence over their price," the Economist reports (7/16). Meanwhile, in Cook County, officials are complaining that health reform could harm Stroger Hospital, in Chicago, Chicago Public Radio reports. Its primary business is treating the uninsured and poor. "Those who have insurance don"t necessarily go to a safety net hospital," said Warren Batts, the chairman of the board that oversees Cook County"s health system. If that trend continues in a post-reform world, the hospital could see a 40 percent cut in the $85 million Washington pays them to treat the uninsured, with few gains of paying customers (Spitzer, 7/16). This information was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with kind permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives and sign up for email delivery at kaiserhealthnews.org. © Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.


Add your comment:
Name:
Site address: http://
Your message:
Enter today\\\\'s date, 2 digits
(spam protection):

© Copyright 2009